Research and Studies

Health research and social research publications

The Department of Veterans’ Affairs carries out a wide range of research to support the health and wellbeing needs of veterans and families of veterans. This page brings together a range of DVA commissioned research, evaluations and literature reviews.

Readers should note that some older publications may reflect the evidence base and policy context at the time they were produced and may not fully align with current research, practice, or priorities.

A list of current projects can be seen at Current Research Projects.

Examination of the Potential Exposure of RAN Personnel to Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans via Drinking Water

2002

The final report on the Examination of the Potential Exposure of RAN Personnel to Polychlorinated Dibenzodioxins and Polychlorinated Dibenzofurans via Drinking Water, was submitted by the National Research Centre for Environmental Toxicology (ENTOX) and Queensland Health Scientific Services to the Minister for Veterans’ Affairs in December 2002.

Veteran use of Aged Care services

2002

Conducted by the Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (AIHW) in 2002, this report summarises the results of a study which examined the characteristics and service profile of recipients of Community Aged Care Packages (CACPs) who held a DVA gold or white card and compared this group and those who did not have a DVA gold or white card.

Firefighter Chemical Review — Extension to Review Additional Chemical Substances

Chemical Review (April 2018) to develop toxicological profiles for 132 chemicals listed as contaminants within the RAAF Base, Point Cook former fire training area.

The Firefighter Chemical Review – Extension to Review Additional Chemical Substances reviews an additional 78 chemicals.

Transition And Wellbeing Research Programme: Pathways to Care Report (2018)

This Pathways to Care Report is the second of eight reports and two papers that comprise the Transition and Wellbeing Research Programme, the most comprehensive study undertaken in Australia on the impact of military service on the mental, physical and social health of Transitioned and 2015 Regular Australian Defence Force (ADF) members and their families.

Review of DVA online professional development requirements and incentives

In response to the Senate Inquiry into suicide by veterans and ex-service personnel, The Constant Battle: Suicide by Veterans, DVA commissioned Healthcare Management Advisors to review the veteran-specific online professional development programs for mental health professionals.

Transition and Wellbeing Research Programme - Mental Health Prevalence Report (2018)

This report investigates the mental health symptoms among transitioned ADF members

The Mental Health Impacts of Compensation Claim Assessment Processes

As part of the Government response to the Senate Committee Report, ‘The Constant Battle: Suicide by Veterans’, DVA commissioned Monash University to undertake an independent study of the mental health impacts of compensation claim assessment processes on veterans engaging with DVA and the Commonwealth Superannuation Corporation (CSC).

Literature review of effects of fuel and solvent exposure on human female reproductive outcomes

The aim of this Rapid Evidence Assessment (REA) was to conduct a review of the scientific evidence regarding whether occupational exposures to jet fuels and specified solvents of most relevance to the military were associated with risks to the reproductive health of women.

What are the effective psychological interventions for adults with depression?

This aim of this review was to evaluate the evidence to examine the efficacy of psychological interventions for the treatment of adults with a major depressive episode.

Neurocognitive Effects of Repetitive Low-Level Blast Overpressure in Humans

Contemporary evidence base of published research (both peer-reviewed and grey literature) on the neurocognitive consequences of repetitive lower-level blast (rLLB) exposure and the quality of the evidence base.

Was this page useful?
Please tell us why you selected 'Yes'?
Please tell us why you selected 'No'?